We like to take the opportunity to introduce you to the Third winner of Tiny Library 2021 Architecture Competition- FENG DI and ZHANG LIFANG




Q-How would you introduce yourself / Team /Firm? (50-100 word)
Feng Di: Thank you for the interview. I participated in the competition teaming with my partner, Lifang Zhang, who is now a freelance architect. For the moment I work for a studio in Parma, Italy. We both worked as architects before in Beijing, and graduated from Politecnico di Milano as postgraduates last year. The shared ideas and similar practical experience bond us well.




Q-Give us brief information of your previous projects/ works/ research/achievements?
Feng Di: We both had experience on practical projects. I focused more on large scale commercial complex and residential projects in an urban context, in which the administrative restriction and commercial factors have to be carefully considerate; Lifang had been working as a full-time architect in China for almost 3 years before finishing her master degree in Italy. She more concentrates on small-scale cultural and reconstructive projects.
 




Q-What advice would you give to individuals who struggle to decide whether it would be beneficial for them to participate in architecture vision competitions?
We definitely hold a positive attitude for participation of potential individuals, as the benefits are obvious:
1.     A good opportunity is given to organize one’s thoughts; have one’s method tested, and then the most important, apply one’s unique design philosophy on a project;
2.     Expanding the way of thinking by learning about how other professionals from different background would respond to the same topic;
3.     Could also be rewarding! Anyway, do best!
 
Q-What were the challenges you faced while designing for such architectural space?
The main challenges lie in how to introduce a new practical function into local context in a simple way. On one hand we purposed new intervention to facilitate the urbanization, as a leapfrog development would always be a popular and fast-acting strategy in relatively backward area; while on the other hand we didn’t hope the vernacular convention to be drowned by modernity, but in some way, to be revitalized. The discussion of how to integrate two factors remained active throughout the whole process.
 
Q-What was your thought process while designing for Tiny Library Architecture Competition?
First, we chose a very common farmland in rural area as our site, we consider the project should have universality rather than be a unique one. Then, we tried to establish a direct connection between the functional space and the context, meanwhile the construction should minimize the impact on the field as much as possible. We’d tried many options to balance two aspects until we finally gave the priority to the connection aspect and reduced the impact by inserting a courtyard; Finally, certain activities that link closely to local tradition and culture are conceived to take place in the central courtyard as the nature and convention are simultaneously respected.
 
Q-What attracted you to this competition?
We learnt about the competition from Arch Daily. We have browsed the past competitions which leave us a deep impression: under the guidance of a unique topic, the participants would have the greatest freedom of creation leading to the particular results solving indigenous social problem. Especially the “Tiny” series: sometimes even a minimum amount of work would prove its effectiveness once the regional culture had been considered. We really appreciate this idea and we’d like to contribute what we could.
 
Q-Where does your interest in design come from?
The chosen site lies in an agricultural-oriented area which has a large population engaging in farming. We perceived great potential from living experience because the ignored group still kept certain positive conventions, such as gathering for interaction and cultural events. which provides us the opportunity to intervene in a native way.
 
Q- What design fundamentals do you believe in?
We base our design concept on study of site; vernacular material, and how to blend new intervention into local context.
 
Q-What were your references/ inspiration?
We got inspiration mainly from vernacular elements, regional appearance, and traditional life customs. We also referred to the works of wheat straw, which is very common and resourceful and could be easily found locally.
 
Q-Which aspects of a design do you focus more during designing?
We focus more on cultural aspect of a design. Inevitably, projects are located in a variety of area, and will be used by different people from various background. By study of respective tradition and customs, architecture would act as a bridge that improvs the local life in an effective and regional-friendly way.
 
Q-What according to you is the key to making your design a success?
The key is to, in design process, focus on one main problem rather than complicate it. An explicit and straightforward answer would always easily get across to the audience, while a sophisticated complex could mask the main idea one wants to contend.
 
Q-Which tools do you use during design? What is inside your toolbox? Such as software, application, hardware, books, sources of inspiration etc.?
The basic tools we used include SketchUp, AutoCAD, Photoshop, InDesign and V-ray for Visualization. We also take advantage of many great open sources from internet for design assistance or inspiration, such as OpenStreetMap; Pinterest; Texture.com; etc.
 
Thank you for providing us with this opportunity to interview yo






Subscribe

Get our latest article and updates delivered straight to your inbox.